WF-1000X vs WF-1000XM3
WF-1000X
2017 · $129 today
6440
WF-1000XM3
2019 · $178 today
8967
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why WF-1000X is better
No standout numeric advantages.
Why WF-1000XM3 is better
- Total With Case: 32 hrs vs 9 hrs(3.6× more)
- Earbud Playtime (ANC on): 6 hrs vs 3 hrs(2.0× more)
- Bluetooth Version: 5.0 vs 4.1(22% more)
- Weight (each): 8.5 g vs 8.7 g(lower)
Verdict
WF-1000XM3 leads outright in 6 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | WF-1000X | WF-1000XM3 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio | ||
| Driver Size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Active Noise Cancelling | Yes | Yes (QN1e processor) |
| Battery | ||
| Earbud Playtime (ANC on) | 3 hrs | 6 hrs● |
| Total With Case | 9 hrs | 32 hrs● |
| Fit & Build | ||
| Weight (each) | 8.7 g | 8.5 g● |
| Water Resistance | None | None |
| Features & Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth Version | 4.1 | 5.0● |
| Neckband Included | Yes | — |
| Ambient Sound Mode | Yes | — |
| Ambient Sound Control | — | Yes, adjustable |
| Codec Support | — | SBC, AAC, LDAC |