Shure Aonic 50 vs Master & Dynamic MW65
Shure Aonic 50
2020 · $249 today
7761
Master & Dynamic MW65
2019 · $399 today
7356
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Shure Aonic 50 is better
- Driver Size: 50mm vs 40mm(25% more)
- Weight: 318g vs 390g(23% less)
Why Master & Dynamic MW65 is better
- Battery Life (ANC on): 24 hours vs 20 hours(20% more)
Verdict
Shure Aonic 50 leads outright in 5 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Shure Aonic 50 | Master & Dynamic MW65 |
|---|---|---|
| Audio | ||
| Driver Size | 50mm● | 40mm |
| Frequency Response | 20Hz–20,000Hz | 20Hz–20,000Hz |
| Supported Codecs | SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Low Latency | SBC, AAC, aptX |
| Noise Cancellation | ||
| ANC Type | Adjustable electronic ANC | Fixed-level electronic ANC |
| Ambient Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery Life (ANC on) | 20 hours | 24 hours● |
| Quick Charge | 15 min = 1.5 hours | 15 min = 4 hours |
| Charging Port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Connectivity & Design | ||
| Bluetooth Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Weight | 318g● | 390g |
| Wired Input | 2.5mm | 3.5mm |