Galaxy Tab Active3 vs Toughpad FZ-A2
Toughpad FZ-A2
2016 · $900 today
5828
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Galaxy Tab Active3 is better
- Capacity: 5050 mAh vs 29.6 Wh(170.6× more)
- Weight: 429 g vs 780 g(1.8× less)
- Pixel Density: 283 ppi vs 224 ppi(26% more)
- Battery Life: ~12 hrs vs ~11 hrs(9% more)
- Ingress Protection: IP68 vs IP65(5% more)
Why Toughpad FZ-A2 is better
- Storage: 128 GB vs 64 GB(2.0× more)
- Screen Size: 10.1 in vs 8 in(26% more)
Verdict
Galaxy Tab Active3 leads outright in 6 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Galaxy Tab Active3 | Toughpad FZ-A2 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 8 in | 10.1 in● |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 1920x1200 |
| Pixel Density | 283 ppi● | 224 ppi |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9810 | Intel Atom x5-Z8550 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 GB● |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 5050 mAh● | 29.6 Wh |
| Battery Life | ~12 hrs● | ~11 hrs |
| Design | ||
| Weight | 429 g● | 780 g |
| Ingress Protection | IP68● | IP65 |