Samsung CHG90 (C49HG90) vs LG 38UC99
Samsung CHG90 (C49HG90)
2017 · $799 today
7448
LG 38UC99
2016 · $699 today
6838
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Samsung CHG90 (C49HG90) is better
- Response Time: 1ms MPRT vs 5ms GtG(5.0× less)
- Peak Brightness: 600 nits (HDR peak) vs 300 nits(2.0× more)
- Refresh Rate: 144Hz, FreeSync 2 vs 75Hz, FreeSync(1.9× more)
- Screen Size: 49" (32:9) vs 38" (21:9)(29% more)
- Color Gamut: Quantum Dot, 125% sRGB vs 99% sRGB(26% more)
Why LG 38UC99 is better
- Resolution: 3840 x 1600 vs 3840 x 1080 (DQHD)(48% more)
Verdict
Samsung CHG90 (C49HG90) leads outright in 6 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Samsung CHG90 (C49HG90) | LG 38UC99 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 49" (32:9)● | 38" (21:9) |
| Resolution | 3840 x 1080 (DQHD) | 3840 x 1600● |
| Panel Type | VA, 1800R curved | IPS, curved |
| Peak Brightness | 600 nits (HDR peak)● | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | Quantum Dot, 125% sRGB● | 99% sRGB |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 144Hz, FreeSync 2● | 75Hz, FreeSync |
| Response Time | 1ms MPRT● | 5ms GtG |
| HDR Support | HDR | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Ports | DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0 | USB-C, DisplayPort, 2x HDMI |
| USB Hub | USB 3.0 x2 | USB 3.0 x2 |
| Speakers | No | Yes, 10W stereo |