Blade Stealth 13 (2019) vs Predator Triton 500
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Blade Stealth 13 (2019) is better
- Resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1920x1080 144Hz(13.3× more)
- Weight: 3.09 lbs vs 4.63 lbs(50% less)
- Brightness: 400 nits vs 300 nits(33% more)
- Battery Life: 8 hrs vs 6 hrs(33% more)
- Thickness: 0.60in vs 0.67in(12% less)
Why Predator Triton 500 is better
- GPU: GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q 8GB vs GeForce GTX 1650 4GB(2.0× more)
- Capacity: 84Wh vs 53.6Wh(57% more)
- CPU: Intel Core i7-9750H 2.6GHz 6-core vs Intel Core i7-8565U 1.8GHz(44% more)
- Size: 15.6in vs 13.3in(17% more)
Verdict
No outright leader — they split the dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Blade Stealth 13 (2019) | Predator Triton 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| CPU | Intel Core i7-8565U 1.8GHz | Intel Core i7-9750H 2.6GHz 6-core● |
| RAM | 16GB LPDDR3 | 16GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 512GB SSD | 512GB SSD |
| GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q 8GB● |
| Display | ||
| Size | 13.3in | 15.6in● |
| Resolution | 1920x1080● | 1920x1080 144Hz |
| Brightness | 400 nits● | 300 nits |
| Battery | ||
| Capacity | 53.6Wh | 84Wh● |
| Battery Life | 8 hrs● | 6 hrs |
| Build & Ports | ||
| Weight | 3.09 lbs● | 4.63 lbs |
| Thickness | 0.60in● | 0.67in |
| Ports | USB-C, USB-A, HDMI | Thunderbolt 3, USB-A, mini-DisplayPort |