Panasonic MZ2000 OLED vs Samsung S95C OLED
Panasonic MZ2000 OLED
2023 · $2,599 today
8371
Samsung S95C OLED
2023 · $1,499 today
8674
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Panasonic MZ2000 OLED is better
- Speaker Power: 160 W vs 60 W(2.7× more)
- Peak Brightness: 1500 nits vs 1400 nits(7% more)
- Input Lag: 9.5 ms vs 9.8 ms(lower)
Why Samsung S95C OLED is better
- Refresh Rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz(20% more)
Verdict
Samsung S95C OLED leads outright in 4 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Panasonic MZ2000 OLED | Samsung S95C OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Panel Type | OLED (MLA) | QD-OLED |
| Screen Sizes | 55-77 in | 55-77 in |
| Peak Brightness | 1500 nits● | 1400 nits |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz● |
| Gaming & Performance | ||
| HDMI 2.1 Ports | 4 | 4 |
| VRR | Yes | Yes (incl. G-Sync/FreeSync) |
| Input Lag | 9.5 ms● | 9.8 ms |
| Processor | HCX Pro AI Processor | Neural Quantum Processor 4K |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports Total | 4 | 4 |
| Tuner | ATSC 1.0 | ATSC 1.0/3.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Audio & Smart | ||
| Speaker Power | 160 W● | 60 W |
| Smart Platform | My Home Screen (Fire TV variant available) | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant | Bixby, Alexa, Google Assistant |