OM System OM-3 vs OM System OM-1 Mark II
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why OM System OM-3 is better
- Weight: 483 g vs 599 g(24% less)
Why OM System OM-1 Mark II is better
No standout numeric advantages.
Verdict
OM System OM-1 Mark II leads outright in 3 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | OM System OM-3 | OM System OM-1 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Resolution | 20.4 MP | 20.4 MP |
| Sensor size | Micro Four Thirds (stacked BSI) | — |
| ISO range | 100-25600 | — |
| Sensor Size | — | Micro Four Thirds |
| ISO Range | — | 200-25600 |
| Performance | ||
| Burst rate | 50 fps electronic | — |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2.36M dots | — |
| Burst Rate | — | 50 fps (AF-C) |
| AF Points | — | 1053 |
| Video Resolution | — | 4K60 |
| Video | ||
| Max video resolution | 4K60p | — |
| Body | ||
| Weight | 483 g● | 599 g |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 590 shots | — |
| Storage | Single SD UHS-II | — |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 483 g● | 599 g |
| IBIS | — | 8.5-stop |
| Viewfinder | — | 5.76M-dot EVF |
| Storage | ||
| Card Slots | — | 2 (SD UHS-II) |
| Battery Life | — | 500 shots |