CineBeam HU810P vs UHD65
CineBeam HU810P
2021 · $1,999 today
7460
UHD65
2017 · $1,299 today
7046
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why CineBeam HU810P is better
- Light Source Life: 20000 hrs (laser) vs 4,000 hours(5.0× more)
- Contrast Ratio: 2000000:1 (dynamic) vs 500,000:1 (dynamic)(4.0× more)
- Weight: 6.4 kg vs 12.6 lbs (5.7 kg)(2.0× less)
- Brightness: 2700 lumens vs 2200 lumens(23% more)
Why UHD65 is better
No standout numeric advantages.
Verdict
CineBeam HU810P leads outright in 5 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | CineBeam HU810P | UHD65 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Brightness | 2700 lumens● | 2200 lumens |
| Resolution | 3840x2160 (4K) | — |
| Contrast Ratio | 2000000:1 (dynamic)● | 500,000:1 (dynamic) |
| Optics | ||
| Throw Ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.21-1.59:1 |
| Light Source Life | 20000 hrs (laser)● | 4,000 hours |
| Connectivity | ||
| Smart OS | webOS | — |
| HDMI Inputs | — | 2x HDMI 2.0 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR10 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 6.4 kg● | 12.6 lbs (5.7 kg) |
| Throw Ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.21-1.59:1 |
| Projection Performance | ||
| Brightness | 2700 lumens● | 2200 lumens |
| Contrast Ratio | 2000000:1 (dynamic)● | 500,000:1 (dynamic) |
| Native Resolution | — | 3840x2160 (0.47in DLP XPR) |
| Light Engine | ||
| Light Source | — | 245W Lamp |
| Light Source Life | 20000 hrs (laser)● | 4,000 hours |