Fujifilm X-T5 vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Fujifilm X-T5 is better
- Max shutter: 1/180000 s vs 1/16000 s(11.3× more)
- Megapixels: 40.2 MP vs 24.2 MP(1.7× more)
- Max video: 6.2K 30p vs 4K 60p oversampled(51% more)
- Weight: 557 g vs 670 g(20% less)
- Rear screen: 1.84M-dot tilting vs 1.62M-dot vari-angle(14% more)
Why Canon EOS R6 Mark II is better
- Max native ISO: 102,400 vs 12,800(8.0× more)
- AF points: 1,053 vs 425(2.5× more)
- Burst (max): 40 fps electronic vs 20 fps electronic(2.0× more)
- Stabilisation: 8-stop IBIS vs 7-stop IBIS(14% more)
Verdict
Canon EOS R6 Mark II leads outright in 3 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Fujifilm X-T5 | Canon EOS R6 Mark II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Megapixels | 40.2 MP● | 24.2 MP |
| Sensor format | APS-C X-Trans 5 | Full-frame CMOS |
| Max native ISO | 12,800 | 102,400● |
| Stabilisation | 7-stop IBIS | 8-stop IBIS● |
| Autofocus & speed | ||
| AF points | 425 | 1,053● |
| Burst (max) | 20 fps electronic | 40 fps electronic● |
| Max shutter | 1/180000 s● | 1/16000 s |
| Subject detection | Animal, bird, car, bike | People, animals, vehicles |
| Video | ||
| Max video | 6.2K 30p● | 4K 60p oversampled |
| Video bit depth | 10-bit 4:2:2 | 10-bit 4:2:2 |
| Recording limit | Unlimited (with fan) | Up to 6K RAW external |
| Body & handling | ||
| Viewfinder | 3.69M-dot OLED | 3.69M-dot OLED |
| Rear screen | 1.84M-dot tilting● | 1.62M-dot vari-angle |
| Battery life (CIPA) | 580 shots | 580 shots |
| Weight | 557 g● | 670 g |
| Card slots | 2× SD UHS-II | 2× SD UHS-II |
| Weather sealing | Yes | Yes |