Fitbit Versa 3 vs Fitbit Ionic
Fitbit Versa 3
2020 · $149 today
7962
Fitbit Ionic
2017 · $99 today
6439
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Fitbit Versa 3 is better
- Battery Life: 6 days vs 4 days(50% more)
- Resolution: 336 x 336 vs 348 x 250(30% more)
- Screen Size: 1.58 in vs 1.42 in(11% more)
Why Fitbit Ionic is better
No standout numeric advantages.
Verdict
Fitbit Versa 3 leads outright in 6 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Fitbit Versa 3 | Fitbit Ionic |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 1.58 in● | 1.42 in |
| Resolution | 336 x 336● | 348 x 250 |
| Panel Type | AMOLED | — |
| Always-On Display | — | No |
| Battery & Charging | ||
| Battery Life | 6 days● | 4 days |
| Charging | Magnetic fast charge | Proprietary pogo-pin cradle |
| Health & Sensors | ||
| Heart Rate Monitor | Yes | — |
| Blood Oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Build & Connectivity | ||
| Water Resistance | 50m | 50 m |
| Case Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa built-in | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 days● | 4 days |
| Charging | Magnetic fast charge | Proprietary pogo-pin cradle |
| Health & Fitness | ||
| Heart Rate Sensor | — | PurePulse optical HR |
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | 50m | 50 m |
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 50 g |
| Case Material | Aluminum | Aluminum |