Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 vs Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SC)
Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
2023 · $1,499 today
7869
Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SC)
2023 · $1,199 today
8474
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 is better
No standout numeric advantages.
Why Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SC) is better
- Resolution: 5120x1440 vs 3440x1440(49% more)
- Size: 49" vs 45"(9% more)
- Color Gamut: 99% DCI-P3 vs 98% DCI-P3(higher)
Verdict
Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SC) leads outright in 6 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 | Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SC) |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 45" | 49"● |
| Resolution | 3440x1440 | 5120x1440● |
| Panel Type | OLED | QD-OLED |
| Peak Brightness | 1000 nits | 1000 nits |
| Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 240Hz |
| Bendable Curvature | 800R adjustable | — |
| Curvature | — | 1800R |
| Color | ||
| Color Gamut | 98% DCI-P3 | 99% DCI-P3● |
| Connectivity | ||
| Ports | DP 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB Hub | DP 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB Hub |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | Fixed stand | 120mm |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |