Asus ProArt PA32UC vs BenQ PD3200U
Asus ProArt PA32UC
2017 · $1,799 today
7751
BenQ PD3200U
2016 · $549 today
7545
Dashed outline = score at launch
Why Asus ProArt PA32UC is better
- Peak Brightness: 1000 nits vs 350 nits(2.9× more)
Why BenQ PD3200U is better
- Response Time: 4ms GtG vs 5ms GtG(25% less)
- Color Gamut: 100% sRGB, 90% DCI-P3 vs 95% DCI-P3, 99.5% AdobeRGB(higher)
Verdict
Asus ProArt PA32UC leads outright in 5 of 6 dimensions today.
Spec by spec
| Spec | Asus ProArt PA32UC | BenQ PD3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Screen Size | 32" | 32" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) | 3840 x 2160 (4K) |
| Panel Type | IPS, Quantum Dot, FALD | IPS |
| Peak Brightness | 1000 nits● | 350 nits |
| Color Gamut | 95% DCI-P3, 99.5% AdobeRGB | 100% sRGB, 90% DCI-P3● |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz |
| Response Time | 5ms GtG | 4ms GtG● |
| HDR Support | HDR-10 | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Ports | Thunderbolt 3, DisplayPort, 2x HDMI | DisplayPort, Mini DP, 2x HDMI |
| USB Hub | USB 3.0 x4 | USB 3.0 x4, KVM switch |
| Speakers | No | No |